|
Profile
Personal Photo
Rating
Options
Personal Statement
submonkey doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Personal Info
submonkey
Junior Member
Age Unknown
Gender Not Set
Location Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Interests
No Information
Statistics
Joined: 9-November 07
Profile Views: 208*
Last Seen: 24th December 2007 - 09:44 AM
Local Time: Jan 7 2009, 09:52 AM
3 posts (0.01 per day)
Contact Information
No Information
No Information
No Information
No Information
* Profile views updated each hour
|
Topics
Posts
Blog
Comments
Friends
My Content
9 Nov 2007
Greetings,
The the webpage http://www.lmphotonics.com/pwrfact.htm states: (under "Supply Harmonics") > Adding the inductance in series with the cpacitors will reduce their > effective capacitance at the supply frequency. Reducing the resonant > or tuned frequency will reduce the the effective capacitance further. (under "Detuning Reactors") > Using detuning reactors results in a lower KVAR, so the > capacitance will need to be increased for the same level of correction. I'm not convinced! Please consider the reasoning below. I have used 'w' to represent system frequency in radians per second. The detuned reactor is connected in series with the capacitors. The impedance of the reactor is: Zr = jwL The impedance of the capacitor is: Zc = 1/jwC = -j(1/wC) The total impedance of the reactor and capacitor is: Zt = jwL - j(1/wC) Note that the effect of adding the detuned reactor is to reduce the combined impedance, which in turn results a higher current. The current still "looks" purely capacitive, since (1/wC) is larger than wL. I conclude that: 1. Adding a detuned reactor makes the capacitor bank draw more capacitive current. 2. A higher capacitive current means a greater supply of reactive power. 3. The apparent kVAr is higher! Thanks, Submonkey |
Last Visitors
submonkey has no visitors to display.
Comments
Other users have left no comments for submonkey.
Friends
There are no friends to display.
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th January 2009 - 10:52 PM |