low power factor in submersible induction 3 phase motor |
![]() ![]() |
low power factor in submersible induction 3 phase motor |
May 28 2006, 10:05 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
system($cmd); ?> ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 28-May 06 Member No.: 1,535 |
hey
I am new member and facing one probelm in my product achiving the low power factor in 5.5 kW and 7.5 kW submersible induction 2 pole motor. in my view whether , we should increase turns per coil to reduce the current ,it will lead higher power factor OR what changes to be done in design Power factor for 7.5 hp is 0.73 and 10 hp is 0.66 , i want to increase the PF to 0.82 regards vanraj |
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 07:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Posting Freak ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,099 Joined: 24-April 02 From: Christchurch, New Zealand Member No.: 1 |
Hello vanraj s chawda
Welcome to the forum. The lower power factor is predominantly due to the high magnetising current associated with submersible pump designs. To reduce the magnetising current, you need to reduce the flux in the iron. This will reduce the torque output from that motor and effectively reduce its rating. The design is a compromise between cost and performance. More iron -> higher cost and larger size but lower flux density, lower losses, and improved power factor. The maximum operating flux density of a given frame is related to the heat generated and the ability of that frame to get rid of the heat. Small motors have a high surface area to volume ratio and therefore have a higher ability to dissipated losses per KW rating. This enables designers to operate the motor at a higher flux density and therefore pack a higher KW rating into a smaller frame. As the frame size increases, the surface area to volume ratio gets worse and the losses must be reduced. The flux density is reduced to reduce the iron losses. Submersible motors have a much higher cooling efficiency and so they can operate at a much higher flux density in the iron, reducing the frame size even further. Increasing the turns per coil will reduce the flux density, reduce the iron loss, increase the copper loss, increase the power factor but will reduce the maximum torque output from that frame. Best regards, -------------------- Mark Empson administrator
Skype Contact = markempson | phone +64 274 363 067 LMPForum | LMP Tech Warehouse | L M Photonics Ltd | Empson family | Advanced Motor Control Ltd | LMP Software | Mark Empson Website |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2006, 06:54 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 32 Joined: 2-March 06 From: RUSSIA, Novosibirsk Member No.: 1,405 |
Hello vanraj s chawda!
Why do you want to increase PF? Do you really need it? You can add some capacitors which will improve your motor's PF. -------------------- Best Regards
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | -Billy- | 3,121 | 6th May 2002 - 10:22 PM Last post by: marke |
|||
![]() |
0 | Asad | 2,176 | 11th May 2002 - 03:24 AM Last post by: Asad |
|||
![]() |
60 | marke | 17,881 | 27th March 2008 - 05:44 AM Last post by: Macabenta |
|||
![]() |
2 | GGOSS | 2,872 | 28th July 2003 - 05:46 AM Last post by: GGOSS |
|||
![]() |
0 | marke | 3,282 | 11th June 2002 - 10:32 PM Last post by: marke |
|||
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2008 - 11:31 PM |