IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
PWM signals for governor
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
chaterpilar
post Jul 29 2006, 02:48 PM
Post #1


Member
****

Group: Full Member
Posts: 165
Joined: 3-September 04
Member No.: 861



Hi !!


We are using Woodard make Load sharing module for our new ( 6th) CAT generator.
We notice a speed drop when load is applied.
The engine is 45 meter away from this module.( module governs speed based on Load).

The manufacturer recommends a max of 30 metres between module and engine.

Now, my questions are,


1)Will this distance effect the signal ( PWM) ?

We have used screened cable, untwisted cores, and grounded at one end only.

2)Will twisted pair screened cable be better?


3) Is there any attenuator/amplifier availabe for PWM signals which i can install midway to strengthen the speed signal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marke
post Aug 15 2006, 08:09 AM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2,118
Joined: 24-April 02
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Member No.: 1



Hello Chaterpilar

If the output of the controller is a PWM ouptu, it will have a high frequency component. The length of the cable with have an impact on the resistance, inductance and capacitance of the cable. This will have an impact on the result if the resistance and/or inductance of the cable are significant relative to the circuit connected on the output of the cable. The capacitance will have an impact if the output impedance of the PWM circuit is current limited. If the problem is due to the capacitance of the cable, a non screen cable may help to improve the situation, but the capacitance between the cores will still be an issue.
Inline amplifiers are possible, but I would need to have a lot of information on the PWM output and the input circuit. Best you ask the agents about this one.

Best regards,


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
waross
post Oct 8 2006, 05:43 AM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 9-April 06
Member No.: 1,464



If your load control module is set to droop mode, then this would be normal operation.
In parallel operation, a problem with the load control module will be a load sharing problem. All generators in parallel will be locked to the same speed. An attenuation problem with the PVM signal to one set will cause that set to take less than it's share of the load, but the parallel connection will not permit one set to run at a lower speed than the other sets.
yours
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chaterpilar
post Oct 31 2006, 12:52 PM
Post #4


Member
****

Group: Full Member
Posts: 165
Joined: 3-September 04
Member No.: 861



QUOTE(waross @ Oct 8 2006, 08:43 AM) [snapback]4649[/snapback]

If your load control module is set to droop mode, then this would be normal operation.
In parallel operation, a problem with the load control module will be a load sharing problem. All generators in parallel will be locked to the same speed. An attenuation problem with the PVM signal to one set will cause that set to take less than it's share of the load, but the parallel connection will not permit one set to run at a lower speed than the other sets.
yours



Waross,


We are using isochronous mode and hence droop is bypassed.
The problem was the distance between the synchronising panel and the LSM which as per Woodward cannot be more than 30 metres We relocated the Wood ward LSM and the problem was solved.

chaterpilar
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 





RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 08:57 PM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd