IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Single Phase Power Factor Correction
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
tinku
post Sep 19 2007, 06:26 AM
Post #1



*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 5-June 07
Member No.: 3,337




hi

i want to improve the powerfactor for eg 0.5 to 0.9
is there any diference between reduction of Kwhrs.
can any one plse give me the details.


regards
tinku

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marke
post Sep 19 2007, 07:02 AM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2,088
Joined: 24-April 02
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Member No.: 1



Hello tinku

Welcome to the forum.

You can certainly power factor correct single phase loads, but you will not save any KWHrs by doing so.
There are a number of suppliers of domestic "energy savers" that are just a power factor capacitor, and some of these suppliers claim substantial energy saving from their usage, but the reality is that if there is a poor inductive power factor, the current can be reduced, but the KW can not.

As has been stated many times, you will only benefit from power factor correction if you are paying a penalty for poor power factor. This may be a power factor penalty, or a KVA maximum demand penalty or similar.
You do not pay these in domestic situations, only larger industrial installations.

Best regards,


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jsmith
post Feb 11 2008, 04:25 AM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 7-February 08
Member No.: 4,265



just wanted to clarify about this.

at poor power factors, in applications that require constant amount of power, there will be an increased current (P=V*I*PF, PF goes down I goes up to maintain power and vice versa)

could it be possible that the energy saving claims refer to I^2*R losses?

i understand that there will be no reduction in KWhr because you arent reducing the power. and copper losses in a residential application should be near insignificant (due to low resistance).

of course could be entirely wrong with this, but im 90% sure of my theory
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jraef
post Feb 14 2008, 07:17 AM
Post #4


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 648
Joined: 22-February 03
From: USA, California
Member No.: 285



No, you are essentially correct, but the problem is, i2r losses are, as you point out, relatively low in a motor and can be reduced in an installation by simply using the proper sized conductors. In other words, if they show energy savings from reduction of i2r losses in an installation, chances are the conductors were undersized to begin with.

The reductio of i2r losses does show up in the main utility power distribution system, but any 1 phase residential installation is insignificant to the total and in fact, even large groups of residential users don't amount to enough for utilities to worry about.


--------------------
"He's not dead, he's just pinin' for the fjords!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   1 -Billy- 2,905 6th May 2002 - 10:22 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   0 Asad 2,017 11th May 2002 - 03:24 AM
Last post by: Asad
No new   60 marke 16,922 27th March 2008 - 05:44 AM
Last post by: Macabenta
No New Posts   2 Itos 1,982 13th August 2002 - 03:40 PM
Last post by: nadeem1990pk
No New Posts   4 Itos 1,680 24th June 2002 - 04:02 AM
Last post by: Itos



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th October 2008 - 11:55 PM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd