IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Power Factor Correction, PREFERRABLE LOCATION OF CAPACITORS FOR MOTORS
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
MUTHU
post Jan 12 2008, 08:20 AM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 15-December 07
Member No.: 4,107



SIRs,
Seasonal Greetings.
1. Which one of the following alternatives is preferrable location for installing the power factor correction capacitors for squirrel cage AC 3 phase 415 V induction motors ?
i)In the main control panel with separate Circuit Breakers for capacitor
ii)In the starter on the supply side (common circuit breaker for Motor and Capacitor)
iii)In the starter on the motor load/side (common circuit breaker for Motor and Capacitor)

2. In our organisation, in few installations we have capacitors connected in main panel as in alternative (i) above, some times the operator forgets to switch on the capacitors when the motors are started and in running. This results in low power factor problem and consequent penalities. Hence I think that the capacitors can be connected in the starter near the motor load centre as in alternative (iii) above. Is it correct and safe? Will such method result in any additional problem for differnt type of starters such as Auto Transformer starter, Soft Starters, Star Delta Starter?

Kindly help me
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marke
post Jan 12 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2,060
Joined: 24-April 02
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Member No.: 1



Hello MUTHU

First, have a look at http://www.LMPhtonics.com/pwrfact.htm and see the difference between static correction and bulk correction.
The addition of power factor correction correctly used, will reduce the current drawn from the supply. This will reduce any maximum demand KVA penalty that may be applied to the power bill. It will not alter the power drawn by the motors.
If you have significant cable losses between you main switchboard and the motors, then adding the power factor correction at the motor will reduce the current in those cables and reduce the voltage drop and the KW losses in the cable.

If you use bulk correction, you should use a power factor controller to control the capacitors. This will keep the power factor to a required level. If you manually switch the capacitors, you need to switch them as the load changes and you will never get it right.
Too much capacitance is as bad as too little, or if there are resonance problems, it can be very damaging.

The choice comes down to economics.
If you have the capacitors at the main supply or switchboard, I would recommend that you add a controller to control the capacitors.

Best regards,


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   1 -Billy- 2,683 6th May 2002 - 10:22 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   0 Asad 1,845 11th May 2002 - 03:24 AM
Last post by: Asad
No new   60 marke 16,092 27th March 2008 - 05:44 AM
Last post by: Macabenta
No New Posts   2 Itos 1,829 13th August 2002 - 03:40 PM
Last post by: nadeem1990pk
No New Posts   4 Itos 1,495 24th June 2002 - 04:02 AM
Last post by: Itos



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th August 2008 - 12:46 AM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd