IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Selection of Inverter for Hoist
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
dip04051978
post Mar 26 2004, 11:09 AM
Post #1


Intermediate Member
***

Group: Full Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 9-August 03
From: Anand
Member No.: 445



What will be the parameter affect on selection of Inverver for Crane Hoist Mechanism??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jraef
post Mar 28 2004, 07:10 PM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 648
Joined: 22-February 03
From: USA, California
Member No.: 285



You will want an inverter that is designed for that application. It will need to be Closed Loop Vector, meaning that you will put an encoder on the shaft to feed back to the inverter for true motor shaft position in the vector calulatiions. Open Loop Vector is good for most any application EXCEPT hoists. I have heard that those who offer DTC (Direct Torque Control) claim to be capable of hoist control without an encoder, but I would NOT stand underneath one!

The next thing to insist on is commonly referred to as a "Torque Proving" feature, although the name may be different among manufacturers. This provides for testing that the motor is at 100% torque at zero speed BEFORE the mechanical holding brake is released. It seems like a given, but not all inverters, even Closed Loop Vector, are capable of this. Without it the load may begin to drop slightly before the inverter can calculate the proper output vector, then the motor may become incapable of stopping a moving load on the fly!

You must also carefully consider the input signal requirements. If you are retrofitting an existing hoist control, the voltage levels of the inputs must be capable of matching the existing control system. this seems like a minor issue but it is one that can cause lots of problems right at the very end of the project cycle (I have learned this the hard way!)


--------------------
"He's not dead, he's just pinin' for the fjords!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl
post Aug 11 2005, 08:02 AM
Post #3


Member
****

Group: Full Member
Posts: 67
Joined: 30-May 05
Member No.: 1,115



I done a application for a hoist in Cape Town, the one thing that I do remember about it..I'm talking a few good year now, Is that there was a hell of a lot of regen. We had to fit a bank of resitors in a seperate panel I remeber the resitors glowing red hot!! Infact it would have made a good food cooking unit
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bob
post Aug 16 2005, 06:38 AM
Post #4


Member
****

Group: Full Member
Posts: 183
Joined: 16-August 05
Member No.: 1,186



I agere perfectly that the drive should be ble to provide full torque at zero speed before releasing the mechanical brake. I also suggest that the drive should also be able to old the load in case of breakdown of the mechanical brake. Some drives do give an output known as zero speed control and this can be used to hold the load and gradually lowering the load at reduced speed.
Bob
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest__*
post Aug 16 2005, 11:57 PM
Post #5





Guests






In reply to jraef, I have used DTC drives on hoists, and the manufacturer strongly recomends that encoder feedback is installed. However, I have failed the encoder feedback and there is no noticable difference in performance with out it.

The drive spec does state that the speed accuracy is slightly worse with out the encoder, but we're only talking a fraction of a % of the motor slip frequency.

In general, when putting a drive onto a hoist do your self a favour and use one with an active front end. The drive may cost a bit more but it is worth it for the peice of mind, you don't have to worry about sizing brake choppers and resistors or install extra fuses and cables. You just commission the drive and let it do its thing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   1 -necr- 1,545 17th January 2003 - 07:44 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   0 ashishl 1,024 23rd May 2003 - 11:15 AM
Last post by: ashishl
No New Posts   3 Lewis 1,116 28th October 2003 - 10:39 AM
Last post by: Raka
No New Posts   1 dip04051978 756 16th August 2003 - 10:29 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   1 Kirk 795 12th September 2003 - 07:36 AM
Last post by: marke



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th October 2008 - 04:19 AM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd