IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Detuning Reactors
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
submonkey
post Nov 9 2007, 12:51 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 9-November 07
Member No.: 3,988



Greetings,

The the webpage http://www.lmphotonics.com/pwrfact.htm states:

(under "Supply Harmonics")
> Adding the inductance in series with the cpacitors will reduce their
> effective capacitance at the supply frequency. Reducing the resonant
> or tuned frequency will reduce the the effective capacitance further.

(under "Detuning Reactors")
> Using detuning reactors results in a lower KVAR, so the
> capacitance will need to be increased for the same level of correction.

I'm not convinced! Please consider the reasoning below. I have used
'w' to represent system frequency in radians per second.

The detuned reactor is connected in series with the
capacitors. The impedance of the reactor is:

Zr = jwL

The impedance of the capacitor is:

Zc = 1/jwC = -j(1/wC)

The total impedance of the reactor and capacitor is:

Zt = jwL - j(1/wC)


Note that the effect of adding the detuned reactor is to
reduce the combined impedance, which in turn results
a higher current. The current still "looks" purely
capacitive, since (1/wC) is larger than wL.

I conclude that:

1. Adding a detuned reactor makes the capacitor bank
draw more capacitive current.

2. A higher capacitive current means a greater supply of
reactive power.

3. The apparent kVAr is higher!

Thanks,
Submonkey
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marke
post Nov 12 2007, 04:08 AM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2,099
Joined: 24-April 02
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Member No.: 1



Hello submonkey

Welcome to the forum.

Yes you are correct, the impedance is reduced and therefore the current is increased. This will of course increase the KVAR of the circuit. - I will correct the comment on the web page. Thank you for picking that up.
No one else has seen this!! It is always a concern that no matter how often you read something, you can miss the obvious.

Have a great day,
Best regards,


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   6 Neutron 1,102 23rd March 2005 - 06:56 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   7 jraef 710 2nd August 2006 - 01:25 AM
Last post by: marke



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2008 - 06:37 PM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd