![]() |
Hello and welcome to LMPForum, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately Register Now There are many great features that are not available to guests at LMPForum |
Forgot Password |
![]() ![]() |
Motor Efficiency |
Jun 13 2006, 05:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 13-June 06 Member No.: 1,567 |
Can anyone tell me more about motor efficiency and the calculation?
Thanks CS |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2006, 11:30 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 141 Joined: 8-May 06 Member No.: 1,497 |
Hi CSTEOH,
Efficiency = Output Power/Input Power. Motors are rated on output power. This is usually described as a percentage at full load. There fore if you had a 15 kW motor that is 90% efficient it would require 16.6 kW input power at full load. You should also be aware that a motors efficiency varies with load. A general rule of thumb is that larger motors are more efficient. The level of efficiency can vary widely between manufactures so it is well worth investigating before purchasing equipment. The initial purchase price of a motor is a fraction of its total lifetime cost so money well spent on a more efficient motor will save plenty in the life time of the motor. An example may be of a motor that runs 18 hrs per day. One brand has an efficiency of 90% and another has an efficiency of 85%. If the motor is 15kW there is .98 kW difference in the input power so .98kW x 18 hrs per day = 17.6 kWh per day x 5 days a week x 52 weeks per year= 4586 kWh per year difference between the two motors. If the motor is on an industrial application then the hours run could be greater and so will the kWh difference. If we assume a cost of 10c/kWh then the cost difference per year is $458. It does not take long to payback the initial extra expence of a high efficiency motor. If we assume that the motor will operate for 15 years then the savings are nearly $7000. Ken -------------------- An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2006, 12:13 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 404 Joined: 17-May 02 From: Melbourne Member No.: 14 |
Well done Kens,
Regards, GGOSS |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2006, 10:13 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 141 Joined: 8-May 06 Member No.: 1,497 |
Hi CSTEOH, often the motor will not have the efficiency on the name plate but you can still get a pretty good idea from the information that is there. Our 15 kW motor name plate may have the following data
15 kW 400V 50Hz 1460 rpm 29A p.f. .82. These are all rated at full load. We first need to calculate our kW input from this data so kW =√3 x V x I x cosΦ/ 1000 or 1.732 x 400 x 29 x .82 / 1000 = 16.47 kW. Efficiency = Input Power / Output Power so 16.47 / 15 = .91 or 91%. If you don’t have the efficiencies listed you can use the above to get a pretty good idea about different motors performance. Ken -------------------- An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 02:34 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 34 Joined: 2-March 06 From: RUSSIA, Novosibirsk Member No.: 1,405 |
Hello!
to kens, CSTEOH Only one thing, you have calculated this efficiency for nominal mode, but really it is the very curved characteristic which starts from 0 when speed's 0 to max when speed's nominal. -------------------- Best Regards
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 02:53 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 141 Joined: 8-May 06 Member No.: 1,497 |
Hi Tua, you are right, these are all calculations based on the Full Load ratings of the motor.
Cheers Ken -------------------- An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 05:44 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 213 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Milan, Italy Member No.: 1,068 |
Dear kens,
QUOTE Efficiency = Input Power / Output Power so 16.47 / 15 = .91 or 91%. by mistake you wrote wrongly, right is: Efficiency = Output Power / Input Power so 15 / 16.47 = .91 or 91%. I would add some considerations on AC motor efficiency under non-sinusoidal main supply. Where harmonics are present, there is to consider further losses due to presence of harmonic currents and related flux in the magnetic circuit. This flux generally make a negative action on output torque. To reduce such power losses - due to undesired harmonics - it is suggested to add some harmonic filters, their cost should be less than the cost of energy saved during years (if motor is used for many hours every day). Cheers Mario -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 04:37 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 13-June 06 Member No.: 1,567 |
THanks Guys, especially to Mr.Ken.
Mr.Kens thanks for the details and the calculation, you are a life saver. There's one more thing that i can get hold of, can we actually calculate the power factor of an induction motor or do we need to used a power analyzer? Regards CS |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 06:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Posting Freak ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,383 Joined: 24-April 02 From: Christchurch, New Zealand Member No.: 1 |
Hello CSTEOH
You can calculate the power factor if you know the KVA input and the KW input. The power factor is the KW/KVA. Note Input KW not rated KW which is shaft or output KW. Somewhere, you will need to make some measurments. Best regards, -------------------- Mark Empson administrator
Skype Contact = markempson | phone +64 274 363 067 LMPForum | LMP Tech Warehouse | L M Photonics Ltd | Empson family | Advanced Motor Control Ltd | LMP Software | Mark Empson Website |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 09:57 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 141 Joined: 8-May 06 Member No.: 1,497 |
QUOTE(mariomaggi @ Jun 15 2006, 05:44 PM) [snapback]3777[/snapback] Dear kens, by mistake you wrote wrongly, right is: Efficiency = Output Power / Input Power so 15 / 16.47 = .91 or 91%. I would add some considerations on AC motor efficiency under non-sinusoidal main supply. Where harmonics are present, there is to consider further losses due to presence of harmonic currents and related flux in the magnetic circuit. This flux generally make a negative action on output torque. To reduce such power losses - due to undesired harmonics - it is suggested to add some harmonic filters, their cost should be less than the cost of energy saved during years (if motor is used for many hours every day). Cheers Mario Thanks Mario, Not enough coffee yesterday -------------------- An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2006, 12:57 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 13-June 06 Member No.: 1,567 |
Hey Marke,
Thanks for your reply, i just wanna clarify one thing. I didn't really get it, to calculate pf=kw/kva right? You note that "input kw and not rated kw which is shaft or output kw" If i didnt get it wrongly, i should used input kw instead of rated kw. Im not really familiar with induction motors terms, if you don't mind can you pls explain to me the difference betweeen input kw, rated kw, shaft and output kw. Thanks.. To get pf why used input kw instead of rated kw?? Regards CS Hey everyone!!! Actually this is my first time in LMPForum, just wanna let you guys know that im glad that i've join in to this forum. You guys are helpful and i can get alot of info that i need in here. If you guys don't mind i think from today onwards i'll be bugging you guys Once again thanks alot. Cheers to everyone CS |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 09:05 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-March 09 Member No.: 5,203 |
Hi everyone, new member here, hope to stay, this forum will be rather helpful!
Just to check the formula kVA = kW / ( p.f * eff ) is correct? And kW = ( kVA * p.f ) / eff is also correct? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2009, 08:58 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Posting Freak ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,383 Joined: 24-April 02 From: Christchurch, New Zealand Member No.: 1 |
Hello murphfan51
First, it is important to identify which KW you are referring to. There is mechanical output power and electrical input power. Electric circuits are rated for electrical input power and mechanical systems for mechanical shaft power. For the purposes of the description, let us identify these as KWe and KWm Where KWe is the electrical input power and KWm is the mechanical output power. The power rating of an induction motor is usually the rated shaft power of that motor. (KWm) The efficiency of the induction motor is the ratio between the mechanical output power and the electrical input power. eff = KWm/KWe The power factor of an electrical circuit is the ratio between the electrical KW input to the KVA input, so pf = KWe/KVA The mechanical shaft power is therefore KWm = KVA x pf x eff The electrical input power is KWe = KVA x pf So KVA = KWm / pf / eff = KWm / (pf x eff) = KWe / pf Be careful to ensure that you know whether you are referring to mechanical output power (usual with motors) or electrical input power. Best regards, Mark. -------------------- Mark Empson administrator
Skype Contact = markempson | phone +64 274 363 067 LMPForum | LMP Tech Warehouse | L M Photonics Ltd | Empson family | Advanced Motor Control Ltd | LMP Software | Mark Empson Website |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2009, 03:50 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-March 09 Member No.: 5,203 |
Hello murphfan51 First, it is important to identify which KW you are referring to. There is mechanical output power and electrical input power. Electric circuits are rated for electrical input power and mechanical systems for mechanical shaft power. For the purposes of the description, let us identify these as KWe and KWm Where KWe is the electrical input power and KWm is the mechanical output power. The power rating of an induction motor is usually the rated shaft power of that motor. (KWm) The efficiency of the induction motor is the ratio between the mechanical output power and the electrical input power. eff = KWm/KWe The power factor of an electrical circuit is the ratio between the electrical KW input to the KVA input, so pf = KWe/KVA The mechanical shaft power is therefore KWm = KVA x pf x eff The electrical input power is KWe = KVA x pf So KVA = KWm / pf / eff = KWm / (pf x eff) = KWe / pf Be careful to ensure that you know whether you are referring to mechanical output power (usual with motors) or electrical input power. Best regards, Mark. Hi Mark, Thanks for your reply. I am currently studying Electrical Engineering Level 5 (Advanced Trade), which is through Open Polytech in NZ, and sent away my paper which is on Standby Power Plants (and AC Motors). I don't know why I got tripped up on a question like this HAHA, being rather simple compared with the work I have done already, like the advanced AC/Power Factor Theory unit!! I do understand your formulas and Im well aware with the (as i refer to them) OUTPUT and INPUT motor power formula for efficiency. Following is the question I was asked: Find the minimum kW rating of a standard induction motor needed to drive a synchronous generator with an output of 100kVA 0.8 pf, and an efficiency of 0.92 at full load. Well, I did work out that the answer would be the kWm (OUTPUT) power of the motor. I worked out the formula to be: kW(m) = kVA * p.f * eff kW(m) = 100,000 * 0.8 * 0.92 = 73,600W The correct answer was in fact kW(m) = kVA * p.f / eff kW(m) = 100,000 * 0.8 / 0.92 = 86,960W So obviously kVA(out) = kW(out) / p.f And therefore because the efficiency of the motor is less than 100%, the Output power of the motor has to compensate for that loss and must produce a higher power value, resulting in a higher rated motor to be used. Thanks again, Shane |
|
|
|
Jul 5 2009, 10:40 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 5-July 09 From: China Member No.: 5,755 |
"often the motor will not have the efficiency on the name plate but you can still get a pretty good idea from the information that is there."
I think so too. For motor efficiency, I think you need to discuss with the engineers from the manufacturer and talk with the experts. They will give us some good advice. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2009, 07:05 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 78 Joined: 13-June 09 Member No.: 5,502 |
often the motor will not have the efficiency on the name plate but you can still get a pretty good idea from the information that is there.
Our 15 kW motor name plate may have the following data 15 kW 400V 50Hz 1460 rpm 29A p.f. .82. These are all rated at full load. We first need to calculate our kW input from this data so kW =√3 x V x I x cosΦ/ 1000 or 1.732 x 400 x 29 x .82 / 1000 = 16.47 kW. Efficiency = Output Power / Input Power so 15 / 16.47 = .91 or 91%. If you don’t have the efficiencies listed you can use the above to get a pretty good idea about different motors performance. According to this formula the lower p.f. has a motor, the more efficient it is. As is known, p.f. rises with the load, so motor's efficiency falls ? |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2009, 08:29 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 37 Joined: 28-September 08 From: Kuala Lumpur Member No.: 4,848 |
Hi yuri,
Actually the current stated in the name plate refers to full load current. The current drawn by the motor depends to the load attached. The output power will also change with respect to the input current. So at low p.f. (lightly loaded case) the motor might draw just enough current to establish flux in the core. This affects the output power as well. When computing the efficiency of the motor, one must always remember that the current (Iline) and p.f keeps changing until the motor is operating at full load. efficiency = (1.732 x Vline x Iline x p.f) - power loss in motor /(1.732 x Vline x Iline x cos p.f) Regards, kana |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2009, 06:35 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 78 Joined: 13-June 09 Member No.: 5,502 |
I dont know how you can calculate losses in iron and copper, only the formula from the post I cited previously is somewhat misleading as it turns out that a motor, let's say,
1.7kW 220V 10A p.f. 0.8 (all at full load) should be considered more efficient than a motor 1.7kW 220V 10A p.f. 0.9 (all at full load). |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2009, 08:28 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 78 Joined: 13-June 09 Member No.: 5,502 |
Kana's
efficiency = input gross power - power losses in iron, copper, etc/ input gross power does not even consider output power on shaft |
|
|
|
Jul 23 2009, 01:28 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 37 Joined: 28-September 08 From: Kuala Lumpur Member No.: 4,848 |
output power = (1.732 x Vline x Iline x p.f) - power loss in motor
Stator & Rotor Copper losses depends to Iline. Iron losses, rotational losses and stray losses are constant at all time. power loss in motor = stator loss + rotor loss + iron loss + rotational loss + stray loss input power = 1.732 x Vline x Iline x p.f efficiency = output power (shaft power)/input power Regards, Kana |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2 | GGOSS | 5,160 | 28th July 2003 - 05:46 AM Last post by: GGOSS |
|||
![]() |
2 | marke | 7,746 | 4th July 2009 - 05:27 AM Last post by: marke |
|||
![]() |
0 | marke | 6,095 | 11th June 2002 - 10:34 PM Last post by: marke |
|||
![]() |
1 | marke | 4,324 | 7th December 2009 - 10:32 AM Last post by: Broshi |
|||
![]() |
0 | marke | 3,023 | 12th June 2002 - 09:24 AM Last post by: marke |
|||
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd September 2010 - 07:31 PM |