![]() |
Hello and welcome to LMPForum, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately Register Now There are many great features that are not available to guests at LMPForum |
Forgot Password |
![]() ![]() |
Motor, Imbalance |
Sep 8 2009, 09:00 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 12 Joined: 16-December 08 Member No.: 5,027 |
Hi,
I`m actually commisionning a new motor and the imbalance at no load is around 25 % ( 10 A,14 A,10 A)which looks very high. The voltage is normal.Under the loading condition, we are observing a very high slip condition.How much imbalance is normally tolerated ? Bob |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2009, 07:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Posting Freak ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-April 02 From: Christchurch, New Zealand Member No.: 1 |
Hi Bob
This level of imbalance is not too unusual with an unloaded motor. You will find that the imbalance will reduce as load is applied to the motor. The imbalance occurs because there is always an imbalance in the supply voltage and/or phase angle, and there is also an imbalance in the magnetic circuit of the motor. At no load, you can consider the motor as acting as a generator connected to the supply where the current drawn is the difference between the supply voltage and the voltage generated. This amplifies the percentage variation and increases the imbalance. For the supply to be perfectly balanced, you would need to get identical voltage readings from each phase to neutral, and also between phases. There is always a difference, although some times smaller than others. The motor is wound on to a core that is made up from a stack of laminations. The steel used in the laminations has a magnetic grain and so there is a bias in the inductance of the core unless the steel has been rotated as it has been punched to reduce the overal grain orientation. Rolling the phases around on the motor terminals will usually show one connection that has an exaggerated imbalance and one connection that has a reduced imbalance. As the load is applied, the "load" current will be better balanced and so the imbalance will reduce with increasing load. The important issue is what the imbalance is at full load. The motor can tolerate a large imbalance at no load, but is very intolerant of imbalance at full load. Best regards, Mark. -------------------- Mark Empson administrator
Skype Contact = markempson | phone +64 274 363 067 LMPForum | LMP Tech Warehouse | L M Photonics Ltd | Empson family | Advanced Motor Control Ltd | LMP Software | Mark Empson Website |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2010, 12:33 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Intermediate Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Full Member Posts: 19 Joined: 16-September 07 Member No.: 3,794 |
dear Mark,
your explanation for unbalance in no load currents is very illuminating and true. my observation is that the said un balance is more in case of two pole motors than in case motors with higher no. of poles.Can it be explained why so? with regards subrao |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2010, 09:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Posting Freak ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-April 02 From: Christchurch, New Zealand Member No.: 1 |
Hello Subrao
Yes, I have observed the same but do not have a good explanation. I suspect that the physical positioning of the windings possibly causes the effect of the grain orientation in the steel to have more affect on a two pole motor than a four pole motor. Best regards, Mark. -------------------- Mark Empson administrator
Skype Contact = markempson | phone +64 274 363 067 LMPForum | LMP Tech Warehouse | L M Photonics Ltd | Empson family | Advanced Motor Control Ltd | LMP Software | Mark Empson Website |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2 | GGOSS | 4,666 | 28th July 2003 - 05:46 AM Last post by: GGOSS |
|||
![]() |
2 | marke | 6,835 | 4th July 2009 - 05:27 AM Last post by: marke |
|||
![]() |
0 | marke | 5,318 | 11th June 2002 - 10:34 PM Last post by: marke |
|||
![]() |
1 | marke | 3,828 | 7th December 2009 - 10:32 AM Last post by: Broshi |
|||
![]() |
0 | marke | 2,770 | 12th June 2002 - 09:24 AM Last post by: marke |
|||
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th March 2010 - 06:12 AM |