IPB


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Copper Rotor Motors
Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
subrao
post Oct 16 2007, 11:35 AM
Post #1


Intermediate Member
***

Group: Full Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 16-September 07
Member No.: 3,794



I read lot of articles praising copper rotors instead of conventional aluminum rotors.
It is claimed that as conductivity of copper is more it has less resistance and low slip,lower rotor losses ans improved efficiency.
My problem is that in order to have a good starting characteristics we need to have
a definite rotor resistance.The choice is a compromise between lower losses and starting torque. This choice is without regard to material copper or aluminum.
So How does copper rotor helps to reduce losses at the same time maintaining
the required starting torque?
subrao
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marke
post Oct 16 2007, 06:14 PM
Post #2


Posting Freak
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2,063
Joined: 24-April 02
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Member No.: 1



Hello subrao

Welcome to the forum.

Yes, you have struck the real heart of a problem.
In the major push to improve the operating efficiencies of induction motors, the starting characteristics have been severely compromised.

Part of the efficiency push, is to reduce the slip losses. To do so, requires that the rotor has a very low resistance. As you increase the rotor resistance, you increase the slip and therefore the slip losses. (The slip loss is equal to the torque times the slip)

Copper bars exhibit a lower resistance than aluminium for the same cross sectional area and are therefore used on larger motors to improve the efficiency.
Small motors commonly use diecast aluminium rotors because of the cost of manufacture.

Start current is influenced by the rotor impedance which is a combination of both resistance and reactance. The position of the bars within the rotor alters the reactance of the bars, and the cross sectional area and material of the bars influences the resistance of the rotor.
Start torque. is the power dissipated in the rotor during start, so it is a function of rotor current squared times effective rotor resistance.
If a bar is positioned at the surface of the rotor, it exhibits a low reactance. If the bar is positioned deeper into the rotor, it exhibits a higher reactance.
By using multiple bars, or thin bars with deeper penetration into the rotor, the effective resistance at start can change from the effective resistance during run.
At start, the rotor is stationary and the frequency of the current in the rotor is equal to the line frequency. Reactance is very frequency dependent. At run, the frequency of the current in the rotor is very close to 0Hz and so the reactance drops to almost 0 also. If we have two equal bars in the rotor, one deep and one shallow, then most of the current at start, will be concentrated in the outer bar. This will almost double the effective resistance of the rotor and result in a higher starting torque, but at full speed, both bars are effectively in parallel, reducing the running resistance and slip losses.

Double cage motors used to be a relatively common means of developing a very high start torque with good running characteristics, but we rarely see them today. With the traditional double cage motors, the outer bars could be made of a high resistance material such as brass and the inner bars of copper.

see Induction_Motors#Rotor_Design

Best regards,


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   4 Itos 1,536 24th June 2002 - 04:02 AM
Last post by: Itos
No New Posts   1 Itos 1,365 26th June 2002 - 08:56 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   8 marke 2,807 20th October 2004 - 06:56 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   1 -ksvs29- 1,443 15th August 2002 - 09:22 PM
Last post by: marke
No New Posts   0 GGOSS 1,469 12th August 2002 - 08:28 AM
Last post by: GGOSS



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th September 2008 - 12:47 AM
hosted by : L M Photonics Ltd